Ideas we’ve set aside for now, each with a public reason. Nothing here is gone for good — a well-warmed idea can always come back around.
fighting project loved for the ability to get back the right to take loved maps and rank them despite them being loved already (like free…
fighting project loved for the ability to get back the right to take loved maps and rank them despite them being loved already (like freedom dive arles was for …
Why it's not planned: This isn’t needed, this option was removed for a reason.
whether more bns/nat is a possible solution to the "abundance" of rankable maps and to encourage an increase of diversity in song choice/…
whether more bns/nat is a possible solution to the "abundance" of rankable maps and to encourage an increase of diversity in song choice/mapping choice-wise in …
Why it's not planned: The answer is that there is no current limit or artificial limitation on the number of BNs, and the number of NAT is dictated by the number of qualified candidates and the number of BNs that need to be managed. Not really much to discuss here.
Can we discuss improving discoverability? Maybe the NAT could discuss this "For You Page" as an alternative to the Beatmap Listing · ppy…
Can we discuss improving discoverability? Maybe the NAT could discuss this "For You Page" as an alternative to the Beatmap Listing · ppy osu · Discussion #32525…
Why it's not planned: NATea Time isn’t really an effective method for proposing ideas to Peppy. You can shoot him an email with this idea, which would be far more effective than what the purpose of the NATea Time is.
wiki update veto section
Why it's not planned: Not a discussion topic, just a request for a wiki update.
Reduce mapping limitations · ppy osu · Discussion #35392 discussing these things and if these could be brought up to peppy himself
Why it's not planned: Feel free to email Peppy about it, there is no clear point of discussion to be had on this.